Radar guns have long been used by the police to catch speeding motorists. The purpose of enforcing speed limits is twofold: enhancing road safety and producing revenue for the town's treasury. The safety concerns are obvious. If a motorist drives above the posted speed limit there is greater danger that an accident might occur. Speed limits are based on a number of factors, including the size of the road, the number and sharpness of turns, visibility and the presence of pedestrians. The added revenue helps local government provide services while reducing the need for high taxes.
However, recent advancements to speed violation enforcement have been challenged by legislators and the public as merely a way for local governments to increase revenue without increasing safety on the road. The city government in Ridgeland, SC installed an automated camera and radar system for catching speeders. The system matches high speeds read on a radar gun with photos taken on an unmanned camera.
Automated violation systems are not legal in South Carolina, but the Ridgeland government counters that since a police officer oversees the system it is manned. Therefore the roughly 10,000 citations issued are legal. Though it is true that a police officer oversees the system, he or she does not personally verify every traffic violation.
Those against the automated system argue that it has too much room for error and that it does not provide for greater road safety.
While radar guns are quite accurate, they can become inconsistent if not calibrated from time to time. When issuing a speeding ticket in person, a police officer verifies that his speed detection device is functioning properly and that the device was aimed at the vehicle in question. Police cars have equipment to document the vehicle speed and license plate, so that if the ticket is contested all the data can be verified. But even with all the technology on a police cruiser, human judgement has always been a part of issuing traffic violations. Automated systems remove what is considered a fundamental part of determining violations.
The automated system also does not provide the motorist with the ability to contest the citation on the spot. They would need to return to Ridgeland for a hearing, which for many drivers is too great a distance to justify the return trip. Therefore those citations are automatically upheld.
Issuing citations automatically also does not decrease driving speed, therefore enhancing road safety. Drivers generally slow down after receiving a citation, but their dangerous speeds would continue if they don't receive a citation for weeks or months after the violation. The presence of police officers on roads also slows motorists, so an automated system would not deter speeders as effectively as actual cops.
The South Carolina House Judiciary Committe has heard the public outcry against the new system and they approved a bill that could put an end to Ridgeland's automated system. The new legislation outlaws sending traffic tickets through the mail.
The bill has not yet ended Ridgeland's system, but it may soon. The 10,000 citations issued may be overturned if the system is abandoned.